Is Bri-Fi Still The One For PA-01?

So now, we find ourselves performing our every-other-year ritual of looking at some critical votes by our PA-01 wingnut-disguised-as-moderate Repug U.S. House Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick and trying to determine from that if he rates another two-year term in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Without further ado, let’s get started:

• We might as well begin with Bri’s No vote on President Biden’s Build Back Better bill (here), which the Dems stupidly de-coupled from the corporate spending infrastructure bill; when that happened, the bill was virtually guaranteed to fail, which was predicted by Dem U.S. House Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, among others (here). As noted here, in its original form, Build Back Better “aim(ed) to dramatically reduce childcare costs, provide(d) universal pre-kindergarten for children, lower(ed) the cost of prescription drugs for seniors, expand(ed) Medicare to cover hearing aids, extend(ed) work permits to millions of undocumented immigrants and provide(d) the largest-ever investment in efforts to combat the climate crisis.”
  
  And along with every other congressional Republican (and Dem Jared Golden of Maine somehow opposed it also), Bri-Fi voted No.

• Oh, and speaking of AOC, remember when that idiot Paul Gosar of Arizona made that ridiculous (and legally actionable IMO) “snuff” video of the NY-14 Dem U.S. House rep? And remember how Gosar was removed from his committees and censured by the House (here)? Well, Bri-Fi was apparently fine with a depiction of violence against one of his colleagues (with the 1/6 insurrection still fresh in everyone’s minds of course), because he voted No on that resolution also (Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger were the only two Republicans who supported the resolution).
• I know it was noted earlier that the Build Back Better bill (in its initial version) was opposed by every U.S. House Republican and aimed to reduce child care costs. That chiefly came in the form of a child tax credit that would have been fully refundable permanently, benefitting roughly 9 in 10 children across the country (and quite a few in PA-01, I would estimate) and leading to historic reductions in child poverty. This also included an expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit, boosting the incomes of an estimated 17 million working adults. Again, Bri-Fi and his pals voted No (here).
• Bri-Fi and every other U.S. House Republican voted against the Women’s Health Protection Act, passed in the shadow of the infamous Dobbs decision by the “shadow docket” SCOTUS of “Strip Search Sammy” Alito and his buddies (here). As NARAL Pro Choice America noted here, “This legislation would protect the right to abortion throughout the United States at a time when extremist lawmakers in multiple states are enforcing total bans on abortion.” Oh, but “half a loaf” Brian somehow found it in him to support the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act (here), which (as noted here),”prohibits anyone acting under state law from interfering with a person’s ability to access out-of-state abortion services’ (sooo…if you’re a woman of age, you’re not allowed to get an abortion, but Bri-Fi thinks you should be allowed to cross state lines to get one anyway…??? And I couldn’t find an explanation for these mystifying votes on his congressional web site, by the way).
• Br-Fi (as noted here) also voted No on the Consumer Protection and Recovery Act. The bill (an amendment to the FTC Act) restored a key piece of the Federal Trade Commission’s Section 13(b) power, which the FTC previously used to obtain restitution and disgorgement for wronged consumers until the Supreme Court recently limited this authority in AMG Capital Management v. FTC.  The White House also expressed support for the bill. (The Electronic Privacy Information Center) has long called for greater protection of consumer privacy through FTC enforcement and the imposition of financial penalties against companies who engage in unfair data practices (here).
• Oh, and just as a reminder, I should note also that Fitzpatrick joined every other U.S. House Republican last December and voted against funding the government until February of this year (here). According to Politico (here), the reason why is because they were afraid of the noise made by the head of their party against those Republicans who voted for the bipartisan infrastructure bill that was separated from Build Back Better (Adam Kinzinger voted in favor of a related bill, the lone Republican vote it should be noted – Fitzpatrick was one of those who commendably voted Yes for the infrastructure bill, though that really shouldn’t have been that hard of a decision – here).
  
  So…that’s just great, isn’t it? By voting No to fund the government, Bri-Fi said he was OK with delays for Medicare/Social Security/SSI payments, SNAP benefits, shut downs of our national parks, federal employee furloughs as well as cutting back on food inspections, ensuring we had clean air and water, and on and on and on (everything that we rely on from the feds). Oh, but he’s a “moderate,” isn’t he…ugh.
• Here’s another item from last December…remember those text messages that were sent to Trump from White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows related to the January 6^th insurrection? And remember how Meadows received a subpoena to testify before the 1/6 Commission and ignored it, and was held in contempt (I mean, if it were you or I, we’d be in jail by now)? Well, Bri-Fi voted No on the contempt vote, along with every other U.S. House Repug except, again, for Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, as noted here (this really isn’t surprising I guess since Bri-Fi voted No on both Trump impeachment resolutions – more here. Bri-Fi also voted against the 1/6 Commission altogether as noted here…I guess he’s fine with a treasonous insurrection against our government).
• In addition, the America COMPETES Act (HR 4521) passed the U.S. House last February by a vote of 222-210 (here). The Act “includes a historic investment to surge production of American-made semiconductors, tackles supply chain vulnerabilities to make more goods in America, turbocharges America’s scientific research and technological leadership, and strengthens America’s economic and national security at home and abroad” as noted here. I cannot imagine why Bri-Fi would vote in opposition to this bill, but he did.
• Another No vote from Bri-Fi came over the MORE Act last April (here), a cannabis decriminalization bill with three main components: 1) Cannabis would be removed from the list of drugs regulated by the Controlled Substances Act (pot would no longer be a  “Schedule 1” drug, designated for far more dangerous substances such as heroin…more background on that is here); 2) Criminal penalties for federal cannabis offenses would be eliminated; and 3) Past federal cannabis convictions would be expunged. Additional background is here…and while I’m not sold on legalization for recreational use, it’s way past time to decriminalize it, prescribe medical marijuana, and let dispensaries run like regular businesses IMO (and I haven’t been able to find much data on where our beloved commonwealth of PA stands on legalization…I have a feeling that it will be one of the very last places in the U.S. where that eventually happens).
• Oh, and just to remind everyone, in the prior session Bri-Fi voted for a 20-week abortion ban as well as a bill granting legal rights to fetuses (the first step on the way to prosecuting health care professionals for performing services related to abortion), and he also cast a No vote on the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that would have enshrined into law the protections granted by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade (all that and more is here).
• Also in the prior session, he voted against giving asylum detainees diapers, soap, toothbrushes & timely medical checks…what a humanitarian! (here).
• In addition, did I mention that Fitzpatrick opposed COVID relief (returning to the current session), which in part included funding for law enforcement (here, and page 2 from here)?
• Also (and this may be one for the books), Bri-Fi co-sponsored the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act (here), but voted against the bill’s final passage. In the interest of fairness, I’ll present his response on that here, but it should be noted that the markup of the bill was indeed changed. And the reason why it was changed was because of the Buffalo mass shooting that month (as opposed to the other mass shootings in this country, which are just about weekly anymore sadly), in which the suspect specifically targeted African Americans (here). So yes, the bill was changed in light of the threat of domestic terrorism (Bri-Fi may not care about the domestic terror threat, but his old agency does as noted here…and don’t forget that Director Chris Wray was appointed by #45, the de facto head of Bri-Fi’s party).
• Along with every other U.S. House Republican, he voted No on a bill to investigate price gouging by our dirty energy criminals in this country (here).
• And in keeping a bit with the prior No vote on the Domestic Terrorism bill he co-sponsored, Fitzpatrick voted No (along with every other U.S. House Republican) on an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would require white supremacists, Nazi supporters and extremists to be removed from the military (noted here…I’ll grant you that it’s a bit of a slippery slope in that it’s a well-intended bill that could boomerang for legal reasons, but the alternative is our thoroughly detrimental status quo where another treasonous insurrection could spring up from those serving our country…given that the 1/6 revolt has happened once, it definitely could happen again).
• Also (and as kind of an obstructionist “bookend” if you will to his original opposition to Build Back Better), Bri-Fi, along with every other U.S. House Republican, voted No to the Inflation Reduction Act (a scaled-back version of BBB – here). Fitzpatrick’s Democratic opponent in the general election, Ashley Ehasz, responded here.
• And as bad as all of this is (and it definitely is that), in my opinion, it actually gets worse. As noted here (according to the Bucks County Beacon, which is doing great work), Fitzpatrick supports a so-called Article V Convention to rewrite the United States Constitution…and if you think Bri-Fi and his pals want to do this to help anyone BESIDES the one percent (a fraction of that, actually), then you truly haven’t been paying attention. This is basically the end game for Charles Koch and the crazed glibertarian plutocrats who want to turn this country into some kind of religio-fascist corpocracy (Thom Hartmann gives us all the “stuff of nightmares” details here – a corporate-media-sanitized related story is here).

This may seem hard to believe, but as awful as all of this is concerning Bri-Fi, there is actually more that you can read from here. However, I for one have had enough. It is long past time to dispense with Brian Fitzpatrick and support Ashley Ehasz as our new Democratic rep for PA-01 in the U.S. House. To join the campaign and help elect her in November, please click here.

Update 1 8/22/22: A good bit of this was covered already above, but I still think it bears repeating.

Update 2 8/22/22: I’m not sure how I neglected to mention Fitzpatrick’s opposition to the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, but somehow I did (here)…apologies.

Update 3 8/22/22: Here are 3 more No votes from Fitzpatrick:

• HR 7606 – Meat and Poultry Special Investigator Act of 2022: As noted here, the bill increased enforcement of competition laws and boosted USDA’s resources to investigate abusive market practices. “It will force packers to play fairly. It will improve the markets for producers. It will make it more competitive. It will also lower the prices for consumers. This is going to be a win-win,” according to Walter Schweitzer of the Montana Farmers Union (vote is here).
• HR 963 – FAIR Act of 2022: As noted here, “The FAIR Act…prohibit(s) corporations from forcing working people and consumers into pre-dispute forced arbitration agreements and class action waivers, which are hidden in many non-negotiable employment and consumer contracts. These agreements allow large employers, insurers, lenders, and financial services companies to consistently tip the scales in their favor at the expense of everyday working people and consumers by forcing individuals to give up their right to access to the courts if they wish to begin a job, open a credit card account, obtain a loan, receive nursing home services, use a cell phone, or access other critical goods and services.” (vote is here).
• S 610 – Protecting Medicare and American Farmers from Sequester Cuts Act: Of all of the myriad failures of our corporate media, one of the most glaring ones as far as I’m concerned is the failure to explain the effect of the still-ruinous “sequester” (in which former Repug House Speaker John Boehner once infamously claimed that he got “99 percent of what he wanted”) on the operation of the federal government (more on that is here). Basically, the sequester mandates cuts to designated spending categories of the federal government, and one of those cuts had to do with payments to Medicare providers. As noted here...
  
  The bill would extend the 2% Medicare sequester moratorium through March 31, 2022, and adjust the sequester to 1% between April 1, 2022, and June 30, 2022. It would also increase Medicare physician payments by increasing the physician fee schedule conversion factor by 3% for calendar year 2022. In order to eliminate the potential for an additional 4% Medicare sequester in 2022 due to statutory pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) requirements, S. 610 also contains a PAYGO scorecard waiver that would take effect after adjournment of the first session of the 117th Congress. The (Association of American Medical Colleges) urged Congress to eliminate these cuts in a December 2 statement [refer to Washington Highlights, Dec. 3] and upon release of the legislation, issued a statement supporting the bill and urging Congress to pass the legislation quickly. “Alleviating these devastating cuts is crucial to ensuring that the nation’s teaching hospitals and faculty physicians can continue fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, protecting access to care for the patients and communities they serve, and meeting the nation’s health needs,” the AAMC stated (vote is here).

Once more, to help Dem Ashley Ehasz running against Fitzpatrick, please click here.

Update 8/23/22: For all of the reasons previously noted, I stand by my opinion that Brian Fitzpatrick should not be returned to the U.S. House. However (and again, in the interest of fairness), I should note that he was one of 3 U.S. House Republicans to vote in favor of raising the federal minimum wage to $15 over 6 years, along with the highly unlikely combination of Francis Rooney of Florida and Chris Smith of New Jersey as noted here (which makes Fitzpatrick better on this issue than 7 alleged Democrats and 1 Independent in the U.S. Senate).

Update 9/29/22: I have to be honest and give Bri-Fi credit for this, but as usual, he negates good work by associating with contemptible political clowns like Mike Pompeo (here).

Whose Party Is It Anyway?

This Op-Ed column in the New York Times (sorry – I know it’s behind a pay wall) discusses what passes for “strategy” by the Democratic Governor’s Association, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and other affiliated organizations. Basically, it turns out that the alleged “brain trust” of the Democratic Party has decided to fund the campaigns of Trumpist lunatics to promote these frauds with the expectation that they’ll be easier to beat in the general election. The column tells us that doing this helped to drive out Kelly Shultz in Maryland (supported by outgoing Republican governor Larry Hogan, who admittedly is more moderate than the usual crazies, though he’s been wrong also a few times) at the expense of Trumper Dan Cox, who won the nomination in the gubernatorial contest. This move is also the main reason why Repug U.S. House Rep Peter Meijer lost his primary in Michigan by 4,000 votes to Trumper John Gibbs (Meijer was among the handful of Republicans who voted to impeach Trump following the Capitol insurrection, as the Times tells us). In another example, Repug U.S. Rep David Valadao narrowly won his primary even though Democratic dough was apparently spent to prop up Trumpster Chris Mathys, who said that he wanted to represent the “Trump Conservative/ Businessman” party, whatever the hell that means.

You know, there are times when I feel like smacking myself in the face for actually supporting this thoroughly wretched and bought-and-paid-for political organization, and this is one of those times. Yes, I’m totally aware that the other side is run pretty much by brown-shirt fascists, and that has a lot to do with me maintaining my allegiance to the Democratic Party. However, like you I’m sure, I should point out that I get DELUGED on a continual basis with phone calls, Emails, texts…you name it, from seemingly EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT RUNNING FOR NATIONAL POLITICAL OFFICE as well as PA, with EVERYBODY putting the bite on me for money. And yes, there are plenty of good Dems who deserve our support…Ashley Ehasz, Perry Warren, Steve Santarsiero, John Fetterman, Josh Shapiro, and more than a few others…but they represent a political organization that has a leadership that is run by THOROUGHLY COMPROMISED FRAUDS who are products of the D.C. political/media/industrial complex, and TAKE EVERY CONCEIVABLE OPPORTUNITY TO ACT LIKE IT. And as a result of this utterly brainless move to bankroll the opposition, I and everyone else now have to wonder whether or not my donation will actually be used by the candidate I support (though I suppose the damage has already been done to a large degree if the goal was to impact primary contests) or if it will go to some “oppo” move like the one the Times is talking about (I’m picturing a circus clown wearing a DNC logo smearing grease paint on his or her face and tripping over a pair of exploding, oversized shoes!). And yes, I’m looking at you, Nancy Pelosi (for that “glass of water” comment about AOC if for no other reason), as well as Senate Majority “Leader” Chuck Schumer who apparently is completely unable to keep both President Manchin and Vice President Sinema in line to pass legislation that would enable Democrats to hold Congress after the fall elections. And what’s worse is that we had that horrible SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe gift-wrapped by “Strip Search Sammy” Alito and his pals (the human consequences are catastrophic, but the political benefit could be “the gift that keeps on giving”)…and THIS is what the Dems decide to do with it! Imagine being an actual or potential Democratic Party voter realizing what has transpired on the critical issue of women’s bodily autonomy and believing that you have no choice but to support Democrats because the other major political party in this country is certifiably nuts, so you contribute your hard-earned dollars…and then find out that your money was used to support some demented Republican as part of some weird and wrong-headed calculation that could backfire all over the place!

Apparently, one of the contests that was affected by this idiotic oppo funding move was that of Doug Mastriano, the Trumper running for PA governor (noted here). And I suppose whoever came up with the bright idea to fund Mastriano thought, “oh, there’s no way he could be elected. He’s waay too extreme.” Well, guess what? I thought the same thing about Former President Fergus Laing running against HRC in 2016, but then I experienced a bit of a revelation. About six years ago this month, I attended a funeral for the father of a family friend in Lawndale, which (for those not familiar with the area) is an older row home community in Northeast Philadelphia mainly composed of retired individuals, single-parent-female households with kids, families of varied ethnicities…pretty much America in our current times, notwithstanding Fix Noise propaganda. I parked my car and got out to go to the funeral home and pay my respects…and immediately saw Trump/Pence signs on home lawns everywhere. My first thought was, boy, have we got a problem. And, as it turned out, we did (I mean…you would THINK there wouldn’t be that degree of support for someone as nutty as Our Ochre Abomination, but yeah, when you’re down on your luck and destitute and think the system is hopelessly rigged and nobody has an answer…well, you’d be tempted to “break the glass” and do anything to wreck the awful economic status quo you’ve been conned into accepting). And who’s to say Mastriano wouldn’t have that utterly wrong-headed perception going for him this fall?

Also, here is another ridiculously simple political axiom that even someone like your humble narrator can comprehend; when it comes to politics (as well as sports), winning often begets winning. And in politics, that means campaign dollars (as in, everyone wants to be part of a winner, which often gets reflected with small-dollar donations). And a political campaign that knew what it was doing would put that money into the best possible “ground game” to do canvassing, phone banking, putting up yard/highway signs…basically, the whole “nuts and bolts” stuff to Get Out The Vote (including newspaper Op-Eds as well as the social media stuff) that often leads to victory in November. Cutting to the chase, I have no idea where Mastriano is on that score, but his party never seems to have a problem with funding (and even though their ideas are completely detrimental to our well being, his party knows what to do to get out their base). Also, I have no idea what the current polling is on the PA governor’s race (with November still being a long way off, though time will race by I’m sure). To put it in fewer words, Mastriano, Trumpist lunatic and insurrectionist, treasonous fraud that he is (and don’t give me this “Christian nationalist” shit – there’s nothing “Christian” about him!) COULD ACTUALLY FREAKING WIN! AND YOU’VE HELPED BANKROLL HIM, DNC! HECKUVA JOB!

(Update: I believe the funding came from the Shapiro campaign, but I’ll try to find better sourcing on that.)

Mastriano has gone on record as saying that, if he were elected governor, he would have electors of his choice seated to certify PA’s votes in the 2024 presidential election and beyond (here). He would also require voters in this state to re-register (here), and would no doubt find a way to purge Democrats in the process. He has also said that he would unilaterally de-certify election results (here). THIS IS THE SORT OF LUNATIC WHO COULD CONCEIVABLY BE OUR NEXT GOVERNOR!

(I’ve often wondered what would have happened if, God forbid, Scott “Stomp On Tom Wolf’s Face With Golf Cleats” Wagner had managed to win election as governor in 2016. Well, at a minimum, I’m sure we’d have twice as many people dead in this commonwealth from COVID that we’ve had already, with much more ruinous consequences I’m sure that we can only imagine. And we’d be buying into that and a hell of a lot more with a Mastriano win in November.)

It would have made A HELL OF A LOT MORE SENSE to use that money to build the campaigns of congressional Democratic U.S. House and Senate candidates as well as congressional and gubernatorial candidates in state elections, to say nothing of city and municipal contests. Somehow, Republicans have learned how to build organizational capacity form the ground up (school boards, county and municipal supervisor boards, etc.) and Dems seem to struggle with doing that. And don’t even get me started on social media, where what passes for the DNC, DCCC and DSCC YouTube “presence,” for example, is truly laughable, to be kind (I even checked “Bold Progressives,” and the most “current” video was a year old!). Even though social media is relatively cheap, do you honestly intend to tell me that the DNC somehow didn’t have the dough to spend on THAT also?

I believe (and hope and pray also) that the party can recover from this insanely ridiculous calculation since the primaries (to the best of my knowledge) are nearly over (and of course, we all need to do our best to achieve the best possible result). However, the person or persons responsible for this clownish decision should be summarily fired at the earliest conceivable opportunity and should never be able to exert any influence whatsoever in a political campaign ever again.

Update: And as if we needed further proof regarding this idiotic strategy, I should note that, in yesterday’s Dem U.S. Senate primary in Missouri, Lucas Kunce (a veteran with great progressive bona fides) lost to Trudy Busch Valentine (here), who didn’t even know what the issue was regarding Citizens United (here). Gee, ya’ think some of that “oppo” dough could have gone to Kunce instead to make sure a better Dem won for the general election?

Update 11/18/22: The point of this post was to sound off about what I thought was the total idiocy of supporting Trump candidates by the Dems instead of using those funds to support Democratic candidates. I thought that was a doomed strategy, and I thought people like James Carville were nuts to be cheering on such an idiotic plan.

I was completely and totally wrong. With the exception of J.D. Vance winning in Ohio (and I have a feeling there were other factors in play, though I don’t know exactly what was happening “on the ground”), every one of the Trumpers lost, as far as I know.

To be honest, this is why I do this sort of thing as a hobby as opposed to earning an income with it.

My 2020 Election Postscript (Updates)

OK, as I type this, it’s all but done for Biden/Harris, now that they’re leading in PA and GA, thank God (and by the way, I was dismissive in the past of Stacey Abrams for being this almost ubiquitous presence on MSNBC about any center-left issue that existed without having won an election, even though by rights she should be Georgia governor now, but boy, was I wrong – it turned out she worked her ass off to GOTV for Biden/Harris and definitely should be rewarded in the new incoming administration – my apologies and congratulations to her for her efforts).

The White House was, of course, the big prize that we absolutely needed to win, though I’m sure there will be subsequent legal stuff for the foreseeable future (I remember how much the Repugs fought Al Franken getting seated in the U.S. Senate from Minnesota, and you can expect them to do that at a minimum for the White House). However, at this point, you would really have to wonder about any judge or politician doing anything whatsoever to reward a Trumpster, since, electorally, they’re “dead men walking,” and could only end up staining the reputation of anyone who could still help them at this point.

What does it tell you that it was so close? Well, for starters, it’s incredibly hard to knock off an incumbent politician unless they utterly self-destruct (which the Gropenfuhrer most certainly did, basically causing the worst health crisis this country has faced in over 100 years as well as an economy on the verge of collapse). There are many on my side who have claimed and will continue to claim that Biden was a little too chummy with Republicans. Well, that may be. But a win is a win is a win is a win is a win, and that’s what matters at the end of the day, not some damn Dem/liberal/progressive purity test.

I guess I need to remind our side of this again…in 1964, the Republican Party was flat on its back, having been decimated in a presidential and congressional elections. However, they incrementally worked their way back to power (partly by “working the refs” as always) to the point where they were positioned first in 1976 for their movement conservative guy (The Sainted Ronnie R), who actually showed up 4 years too early and caused the Republican split that led to Jimmy Carter winning. By 1980, though (with the internal fight going on between Carter and Ted Kennedy…I vaguely recall a white-haired guy named John Anderson too), they were poised to return to power, which they did with disastrous consequences. It took 16 years, but they pulled it off. And we’ll need to do something like that to accomplish the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, electoral and tax reform, common-sense gun laws, and on and on (though I realize we don’t have 16 years when it comes to the health of this planet).

The moral of the story is that you have no choice but to play the long game. Like many of you I’m sure, I saw people online like Peter Daou absolutely losing their minds, railing against “corporate Dems.” Yes, I most definitely don’t like them either. But to build a winning coalition (especially for our side), you have to bring a lot of folks to the table, including them. And if you don’t have the political inclination for the sort of “horse trading” and deal-making you need to engage in as a politician to pull off that feat or something like it, then why the hell are you bothering to run in the first place? That’s just the reality, and I don’t know what else to say about it.

Any by the way (speaking of politicians adept at “horse trading”), how about giving Nancy Pelosi a little credit for holding the U.S. House (though apparently Dems lost seats, which will, and should, prompt some self-reflection)? And unfortunately, it looks unlikely that Christina Finello will be going to D.C. as part of the majority, with the PA-01 contest very nearly settled in Brian Fitzpatrick’s favor. However, as far as I could see, Finello ran the best campaign I’ve seen a Dem run for that seat in a long time. I thought Steve Santarsiero acquitted himself admirably in 2016 – Scott Wallace has a great progressive lineage but not much else for my money two years ago, and Kathy Boockvar worked hard and ran well (I always felt the best Dem for that was Patrick Murphy, who managed to win twice), but I loved Finello’s combativeness and the fact that she NEVER let up on reminding everyone just how wedded to Trump Bri-Fi really is. Also, Finello expertly used social media to advance her campaign. The biggest factor going for Bri-Fi, though, is that he does have a bit of a record of some votes that are actually sane, though I believe his terrible votes far outweigh that. Also (and this is something else I’ve said before), never forget how Repug-friendly this district truly is. That sliver of Montco may be a little “swingy,” but Bucks County is red to its core. I honestly don’t know how you make enough of an inroads on that to effect a different electoral outcome, but we have a couple of years to go back to the drawing board and try to come up with a new strategy for next time (also, congratulations to Perry Warren, re-elected for another term in Harrisburg from PA-31).

And speaking of self-reflection on the U.S. House Dems, I thought this was an interesting thread on Twitter from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Yes, I realize the country overall doesn’t share the same demographic composition of her district (not yet, anyway), but I thought she made a lot of good points about the people who are really the core for a lot of the party (African Americans, poor working class…and that’s not a pejorative comment by the way…various other demographics including LGBTQ and non-whites) and how their issues need to be addressed. This was spurred a bit by recent comments here from “centrist” Dems like Conor Lamb and Abigail Spanberger, who all but blamed “the squad” for their harder re-election prospects and the House Dems losing seats. And in response, I would say that there needs to be give-and-take on both sides. Lamb, for example, who has championed fracking in PA, could say that we also need to watch out for children’s health issues that have been linked to fracking, and that affects Lamb’s district too (Will Bunch recently noted this on Twitter also along with AOC), and the NY-14 rep could say that, yeah, I support resolutions to local issues for my constituents, but these people also go out and work in districts that are more centrist than where they live, so issues related to their well-being impact there also (and stuff like the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, again, could be beneficial to the whole country if the party could finally get its messaging together on that – a big “if” I know, unfortunately).

Now to the Senate…

To say I’m relieved that Gary Peters won another term in Michigan is an understatement (though, in typical Trumpian fashion, Peters’ opponent John James is apparently refusing to concede). However, part of me seriously wants to email Peters and say, “Congratulations on your victory. Now, announce to the entire world that you’ll serve your term until 2026 and never seek re-election to the Senate again.”

When you’ve been connected to this stuff for as long as I have (not that I’m a big deal, I hasten to emphasize), a lot of different candidates from all over the place are going to put the bite on you for money. And the Peters campaign was easily the worst at that (or best I guess, depending on how you look at it). I would get easily 3-4 emails every day (“Just got off the phone with my team,” “Outraised again,” “I was the only Democrat for the U.S. Senate outraised this cycle,” “No path to the Senate without Michigan”…true, I know, but DAMN, did it get tiresome).

So I thought, well, maybe I can find a somewhat current video from the campaign to include at this blog. Yeah, well, good luck with that. I was able to find a couple of clips from years ago, along with a testimonial from former President Obama…and that was it. Also (for some reason), Peters and James couldn’t work out some way for the two of them to debate, and all the while, I kept thinking to myself “This could be Claire McCaskill and Joe Donnelly all over again, BUT THIS IS FREAKING MICHIGAN!” And yes, I know the dynamic was also altered by all of the crazy militia garbage going on along with the DeVos family throwing around stupid money to try and get James elected. In a nutshell, I thought Peters’ social media presence (tying into the AOC post earlier) left much to be desired.

So I also thought, if I’m going to focus my contributions on one Senate race in particular, it had damn well better be this one. And after I made my donation, what was I rewarded with? A video of Peters riding a motorcycle.

Ummm…why the hell am I supposed to actually care about that (and as long as I’m on the subject of U.S. Senate Dems having to “get the memo,” someone had better let this guy know his time is about up also. The Repugs ran that stiff Bob Hugin in NJ against him last time, but they won’t make that mistake again.). As for Peters, though, he sure as hell ought to make campaign finance reform a big issue after a performance like this (which it should be for all Dems anyway). Just to show how out-of-hand the money situation has gotten, his office sent out a tweet yesterday saying “Let’s congratulate Gary Peters on his re-election – click here to make a contribution.” HE’S ALREADY FREAKING WON! WILL YOU STOP WITH THE PANHANDLING ALREADY??!!

Update 12/16/20: OK, fair is fair – kudos to Peters for going after that disgusting fraud and utterly repellent human being Ron Johnson here.

Also, it is beyond discouraging that, of all the U.S. Senate races where Dems challenged, so far, we have only ended up with 2 pickups (even though I know that, yes, it’s hard to knock off an incumbent as already stated). One pickup was Mark Kelly in Arizona, who had all kinds of built-in name recognition and was lucky enough to run against the weakest of all Republican Senate incumbents in Martha McSally (not trying to detract from Kelly’s campaign when I say that). The other pickup came in Colorado, where John Hickenlooper had even more built-in name recognition as former Governor, and was running against the second-weakest candidate in Cory Gardner (I was hoping that would work for Steve Bullock in Montana, but it didn’t of course). People like Cenk Uygur have been going nuts over the Dems not running enough progressives, like Daou, and that’s why they didn’t get pickups, which is partly true but also partly wrong. Hickenlooper is most definitely NOT progressive, but it would have been insanity to name another Dem to go against Gardner.

I know you have to put a bit an asterisk next to anyone running in the South (with all due respect to Southern Democrats, fighting a truly lonely and uphill fight, f*ck the South right in the ear – I’ve learned NEVER to trust them in elections, though that doesn’t mean we should throw in the towel either of course). What the hell else was Jaime Harrison supposed to do in South Carolina, for example? Also, this didn’t help Cal Cunningham either – dumb. And even someone as thoroughly corrupt as David Perdue in Georgia is going to a runoff with Jon Ossoff only because the libertarian candidate kept Perdue from 50 percent of the vote (last I saw, Perdue actually was leading Ossoff by about 100K votes, even though Ossoff totally owned Perdue in that last debate). And I have to admit that, deep down, even though I supported her in my way of course, I never took Amy McGrath seriously as a candidate. Yes, we know what Sen. Mr. Elaine Chao is, but he hasn’t lasted this long in his job by being a fool or somehow forgetting how to count. McGrath ended up spending her own stupid amount of money in this campaign and was still beaten by about 20 points. Even if she’d reached out to Charles Booker (who spent a fraction of that money in the Dem primary and very nearly beat her), could she have won working with Booker? Maybe not, but I don’t think Mitch McConnell would have cleaned her clock either.

As far as I’m concerned, there were at least a couple of winnable races out there that we could have captured with a little more imagination and better strategy (and no, I wasn’t “on the ground” in those states). And the pattern was always the same…some social media posts or information getting out there that, say, Texas or Kansas was going purple, or “oh, the Dem has a lead…it’s narrowing, but still leading”…and the Dem ends up losing by double digits. I’m talking about Theresa Greenfield in Iowa and Sara Gideon in Maine (Are you seriously trying to tell me that you couldn’t find a way to knock off somebody as thoroughly compromised as Susan Collins? That being said, I thought this was a very interesting post; again, if there is no message of economic populism – apparently because you don’t have the people on the ground to canvas your electorate and motivate them and independents somehow based on proposed solutions to issues they care about, or don’t understand how to make those kinds of inroads because the political terrain is tougher than you thought – well then, isn’t that the fault of whoever it was who allegedly came up with your strategy? And to be honest, I’d forgotten how red Maine really is also, having elected that brainless oaf Paul LePage as governor for not one but two terms).

Update: And speaking of Greenfield, who raised a ton of dough (though that isn’t an automatic indicator of success as we know), I thought this was interesting.

(Farron Cousins of Ring of Fire presented a recent clip of how quickly voters forgot about Collins and “I Like Beer” Kavanaugh…we’re dealing with easily distracted, low-information voters..and no, I’m not a lib looking down on anybody; I’m just pointing out a fact – I get it that they’re trying to hold everything together with themselves and their families, but it’s just that, for a variety of reasons, the David’s in this country end up firing their slingshots at other David’s instead of the Goliath like they’re supposed to, and I think that’s the biggest obstacle we’re up against. And I overwhelmingly blame Fox News, local news coverage which is more and more conservative, and AM talk radio which is ALL conservative, to say nothing of right-wing social networking and related sites, but that topic is a discussion for another day.)

And yeah, about Sara Gideon in Maine…I went to her web site, and what did I see? Beautiful sweeping vistas of the Maine woods…and oh look, there’s Sara Gideon talking to somebody on a small town street corner in front of clean streets and well-manicured grass surrounding main street shops…and Sara Gideon talking to somebody else on a small town street corner in front of clean streets and well-manicured grass surrounding main street shops…and why the hell am I even at this web site again? I forgot.

Hey, alleged DSCC geniuses…you have literally SECONDS to grab the attention of someone navigating to a web site, especially for candidates like Greenfield (where I saw something similar) and Gideon who have ZERO NATIONAL NAME RECOGNITION! Where the “elevator pitch”? What’s the value proposition for me in giving you my support?

So, given all of that, let’s talk about what that alleged political maven Chuck Schumer, Senate Dem Minority Leader, actually DID DO this cycle. Well, I must say that I just LOVED the hectoring popups to videos with Schumer saying, “Hey YOU. Yes YOU. We have a MAJOR fundraising deadline coming up.” As if I’m supposed to goddamn care when you people GIVE ME NO REASON AT ALL TO VOTE FOR YOUR CANDIDATE!

Here’s something to consider: I hate to use The Lincoln Project as an example (yeah, I know they’re basically Republican grifters), but they would run their good ads, then show a quick video afterwards about how to make a contribution. Maybe Schumer and the Dems should try something like that instead. Stop assuming people will automatically support you because you’re not Republicans. Hey, don’t knock it until you’ve tried it!

This election cycle made my physically sick with stress (I’m sure you can relate…and don’t get me started on the texts and phone calls), and that should NEVER happen! To me, this is even more of a reason for a progressive version of Americans for Prosperity to pretty much indoctrinate Dem/progressive candidates so they can speak intelligently to issues particular to their state and present common sense solutions, and explain the benefits to voters “on the fence” (and DON’T rely on our corporate media for that, which is worse than useless on this stuff…if you need help with crafting policy recommendations, talk to Bernie Sanders…and yes, if Democrats ever got serious about this, I would support such an organization with a recurring contribution). Aside from basic common sense, maybe, if Schumer and the Dems did that MUCH EARLIER in the election cycle, then they wouldn’t fall prey so much to the negative ads when the dark money descends at the very end (something else Schumer and co. continually hectored me about, as if they’re somehow surprised by that). Hell, it’s worth a shot, because what they’re doing NOW isn’t resulting in any pickups (unless you have the situations in Arizona or Colorado as already noted).

Regardless, this should absolutely be the LAST election cycle with Chuck Schumer as the point person in charge of running elections for the DSCC. His track record absolutely stinks. And yes, as noted already, I know all about the “oh help us…dark money has created a lot of last-minute attack ads against our candidates and we’re losing ground” appeals. Maybe if you spent more time cementing in the mind of voters the populism you’re supposed to be all about and had fewer pictures of candidates on farms posing in front of tractors, the last-minute negative garbage wouldn’t be so effective!

Well (as noted previously), at least we still have two opportunities in Georgia, which is a blessing, even though they’re definitely long shots. And I sincerely hope the DSCC makes the ads not really about Perdue or Kelly Loeffler, but McConnell. Drum it into the heads of GA’s voters that they have NO SHOT AT ALL of relief of any kind for the COVID-19 plague with McConnell as Senate Majority Leader, which of course is the God’s-honest truth (and by the way, I commented on Alabama and Doug Jones/Tommy Tuberville elsewhere).

We have no choice but to continue the fight. Let’s try a different, more intelligent strategy. And stop getting the vapors over what centrist Dems may think (and don’t get me started on “socialism,” though, as I’ve often said, “defund the police” is terrible messaging). People like Conor Lamb and Abigail Spanberger, for example, are no more or less important than anyone else in the “big tent.” We all need to find a way to work together, or we will surely sink separately.

Update 1 11/8/20: I think this supports AOC’s argument even more, and confirms what I always suspected about the DNC.

Update 2 11/8/20: I thought this was an incredibly interesting interview with AOC (if you can get to it behind the NYT paywall). Some of what we learn is as follows: she reached out to Democrats running U.S. House campaigns to help with strategy, and 5 took her up on her offer, and all 5 won (and they were in swing districts). Also, she expressed a great deal of frustration with basically being vilified by some members in her caucus, to the point where she doesn’t even know whether or not she’ll even remain in politics 5 years from now, let alone take a run at the U.S. Senate, for example. If she were to get so exasperated to the point where she would walk away, it would be an incalculable loss for the country, let alone the Democrats and her constituents. But, if her frustration reached that point, I wouldn’t blame her one bit if she said the hell with it and gave up.

Update 7/2/21: When it comes to election strategy, advertising, use of social media and all that, I think there’s a ton of good advice in this post. I actually haven’t made my way through all of it, but I definitely intend to.

Bursting the Bri-Fi “Moderate” Bubble (Updates)

A huge hat tip goes out to Kierstyn P. Zolfo of #Indivisible on Twitter for compiling this list of the 10 worst votes by our allegedly “independent” PA-01 U.S. House Rep Brian Fitzpatrick (and by the way, the pic is a nod to his behavior towards his Dem challenger Christina Finello for the PA-01 seat during the most recent debate)…

1)

H.R. 6800 – Fitzpatrick voted No on the HEROES Act (here).

For a refresher on the HEROES Act, please click here.

2)

H.R. 7301 – Fitzpatrick voted No on protecting homeowners and renters from pandemic-related evictions and foreclosures (here).

This bill was sponsored by Dem U.S. House Rep Maxine Waters of CA, a frequent Trump critic, which I’m sure had more than a little bit to do with why Bri-Fi voted against it, not that that’s actually a good reason I hasten to add (here).

Oh, and speaking of Waters, apparently this Repug-come-lately named Joe Collins who is running for Waters seat is talking a lot of smack about her (here). And the fact that Collins is a Navy vet doesn’t give him a pass here either.

3)

H.R. 4617 – Fitzpatrick voted No on the SHIELD Act to enhance the security of our elections (here).

This bill was the third attempt by U.S. House Democrats to shore up the security of our elections; of course, all of those bills ended in the U.S. Senate legislative graveyard of Sen. Mr. Elaine Chao.

According to the article from The Hill…

The bill, sponsored by House Administration Committee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), would require campaigns to report any illicit offers of assistance by foreign governments or agents and would take steps to ensure that online political advertisements are subject to the same rules as TV and radio ads.

“The 2020 federal elections are fast approaching. Public confidence and trust in our elections is of the utmost importance,” Lofgren said on the House floor before the vote. “Free and fair elections are at the core of what it means to live in a democracy like ours. … It is our solemn duty to defend them.”

I guess Bri-Fi doesn’t care about the security of our elections. Figures.

4)

H.R. 3239 – Fitzpatrick voted No on a bill to provide humane treatment for detainees at our border, establishing minimum standards such as providing diapers for babies as well as food and toilets for adults also (here).

More on the bill is here (I truly cannot imagine what could be controversial about supporting this bill, except for the fact that it made the head of Bri-Fi’s party look like the unfeeling sociopath that he truly is as shown here).

5)

H.R. 1644 – Fitzpatrick voted No on a bill to restore Net Neutrality (here).

This bill was authored by Dem U.S. House Rep Mike Doyle of PA, and it would have codified a 2015 FCC policy that ensured that internet providers treated all data requests equally and did not throttle traffic to less-favored sites. Of course, Trump’s handpicked Commission chair Ajit Pai pushed through a repeal of the policy in late 2017 (more here).

This probably isn’t surprising given that one of Bri-Fi’s biggest bundlers is Comcast (here).

6)

H.R. 3624 – Fitzpatrick voted No on a bill requiring companies to disclose their outsourcing practices (here).

As noted here…

The law would also require employers to report a percentage change in the number of employees, by state and country. That way, if your employer laid off 1,000 employees in your state, and hired 1,000 employees in India, the issue would be apparent to the American people.

“In order to recognize companies that hire American workers, we need more information on where workers are based,” said Sherrod Brown (D-OH). “It’s not enough to say you’re dedicated to employing American workers – this will hold companies to the promise to keep workers and business here at home.”

More on the bill is here.

7)

H.R. 3621 – Fitzpatrick voted No on a bill to protect consumers from bad credit reporting practices (here).

This bill, introduced by Dem U.S. House Rep Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, is actually pretty broad-based in terms of providing relief to all sorts of credit applicants, as well as strengthening the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (here…see what happens when you elect Dems who look out for you, as opposed to people like Bri-Fi?).

More on the bill is here.

8)

H.R. 1423 – Fitzpatrick voted No on a bill to protect abused employees from forced arbitration (here).

Dem U.S. House Rep Jerrold Nadler said the following about the bill here…

“Nearly a century ago, Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act to allow merchants to resolve run-of-the-mill contract disputes in a system of private arbitration that would be legally enforceable. The system that Congress envisioned was to be used voluntarily and only between merchants of equal bargaining power.

“However, the Supreme Court over the past 40 years has issued a series of decisions that have expanded the use of arbitration far beyond Congress’s original intent or a fair reading of the text of the Arbitration Act—creating the unjust system we see today.

“Private arbitration has been transformed from a voluntary forum for companies to resolve commercial disputes into a legal nightmare for millions of consumers, employees, and others who are forced into arbitration and are unable to enforce certain fundamental rights in court

..

“H.R. 1423, the FAIR Act, reverses this disastrous trend by prohibiting the enforcement of forced arbitration clauses in consumer, labor, antitrust, and civil rights disputes. Importantly, this legislation does not preclude parties from agreeing to arbitrate a claim after the dispute arises, which will ensure that arbitration agreements are truly voluntary and transparent.

“It does, however, prevent unsuspecting consumers and employees from being forced to give up their right to seek justice in court.

More on the bill is here.

Don’t worry; I’ve saved the two absolute worst votes for last:

9)

H Res 755 – Vote to Impeach President Donald Trump for High Crimes and Misdemeanors (here) – Fitzpatrick voted No of course.

More is here (and here).

🔥🔥🔥 #PA01’s Indivisible group left a message for Trump crony @RepBrianFitz at his office.@GOP: you may have forgotten what your oath means. But we haven’t.

Nice job, @BucksCoKierstyn & team!pic.twitter.com/HvR4m12vuM

— Nick Knudsen 🇺🇸 (@NickKnudsenUS) December 21, 2019

And finally (even though it took place in the prior Congressional session)…

10)

H.R. 1 – Fitzpatrick voted YES to the utterly ruinous GOP tax scam bill in December 2017 (here…more here).

The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities did a much better job of giving this piece of legislative garbage the treatment it so thoroughly deserves; the best thing to do I think is to block out as much time as you can and read their post here. However, I’d like to put up the following graphic from their post which tells the story as far as I’m concerned.

This should prove beyond any doubt that there is nothing “moderate” about Bri-Fi. And to do something about him which is long overdue as far as I’m concerned, please click here to support Christina Finello (and for PA-31 folks, please click here to support Dem incumbent state rep Perry Warren).

Update 10/13/20: And support from the Proud Boys too, huh (here)? Bri-Fi sure keeps interesting company.

Update 10/27/20: I have a couple of late additions to this post:

H.R. 36 – Fitzpatrick voted YES on a bill to restrict abortion even if the mother’s life is in danger and in most cases of rape or incest, and said he would “absolutely” vote to defund Planned Parenthood (here).

This has to do with some legislative monstrosity called the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act sponsored by Bri-Fi’s former fellow House Repug Trent Franks of Arizona, which sought to “(amend) the federal criminal code to make it a crime for any person to perform or attempt to perform an abortion if the probable post-fertilization age of the fetus is 20 weeks or more” (here). As nearly as I can tell, this bill died in the Senate (last action is that it failed to proceed to a vote, fortunately).

In response, 23 different medical organizations wrote in opposition to the bill (here).

And by the way, if the name Trent Franks sounds familiar, it should. As noted here, he resigned from Congress when the House Ethics Committee announced that it would investigate allegations of sexual harassment against him for supposedly asking two female staffers to bear his children as surrogate mothers, with Franks allegedly offering one of them $5 million to carry his child, and retaliating against her when she declined.

Also, as noted here, Scott Wallace, who ran for Bri-Fi’s U.S. House seat and lost in 2018, claimed that Fitzpatrick supported an amendment by Fitzpatrick’s fellow House Repug Fred Upton of Michigan to “decimate funding for pre-existing conditions.” I’m merely presenting what Wallace said here – I have not been able to find a link to a roll call vote on that one (thought it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if it turned out to be true).

Update 10/29/20: And let’s not forget Fitzpatrick’s utterly incorrect claim that the World Health Organization basically blew the call on COVID-19 (here).

Update 11/1/20: Oh yeah, I also forgot that Bri-Fi supports nullification, if you will, of PA’s gun laws ,which sounds better from a marketing perspective than “concealed-carry reciprocity,” though it’s the same damn thing (here).

Completing a PA Mail-In Ballot

I realize there has been some confusion about completing a mail-in (or absentee) ballot in our beloved commonwealth of PA, so based on a recent mailer we received, I’ll try to clear up some of that right now.

What follows are instructions that appear on the mailer about completing a mail-in ballot:

Kind of self-explanatory I guess.

Next is where it starts to get a little tricky:

The so-called “secrecy” envelope has no information on it to preserve the anonymity of the voter. You must put your ballot in the secrecy envelope.

This is what to do after putting the ballot in the secrecy envelope:

Again, we should be OK with this part (and don’t forget to put the secrecy envelope with the ballot in the larger marked envelope of course).

And finally:

To get to iwllvote.com/PA, please click here.

Update: Mail-in ballots will be sent out across Bucks County, PA beginning on 10/7/20. Also, the registration deadline (for online, mail or in person voting) is October 19th.

Notes From The Day After (Updates)

To begin, I think we should congratulate Danielle Friel Otten, a Chester County, PA Democrat who won a seat in the PA state house for the 155th district, as noted here. She campaigned on the utterly ruinous effects of the so-called Mariner East pipeline where she lives. The fact that she was a Democrat who actually won in Chester County is a testament to the perseverance she showed, along with her campaign manager Virginia Kerslake, by knocking on the doors of over 31,000 voters. I wish her the very best in trying to stem the ruinous tide of natural gas exploration not just in her district, but everywhere in this country (hopefully blocking the rabidly anti-environmental actions of Repug State House Speaker Mike Turzai).

Also, closer to these parts, Tina Davis won another term in the PA state house, as did our local rep Perry Warren. In addition, Susan Wild won a U.S. House seat for PA-07, as did Air Force vet Chrissy Houlahan for PA-06.

Here’s another triumph…Steve Santarsiero was victorious in his PA Senate District 10 contest over Marguerite Quinn. Do you want to know what the main issue was that he ran on? Common-sense gun laws to keep our kids safe in school. Of course, it didn’t hurt that Quinn had an A+ rating from the NRA, but all the same…watch and learn, Democrats. This is a winnable issue!

And as we know by now, Bob Casey won another term in the U.S. Senate from PA, and Tom Wolf was re-elected to another term as governor (as a consolation prize, I think we should send Scott Wagner a set of shoes with golf spikes). Also, Bob Menendez won in New Jersey, which really had me concerned for awhile. I sincerely hope he doesn’t try to run for another term, because this was way closer than it should have been (it helped that Bob Hugin was an absolutely awful candidate – we can’t count on the Repugs to make that mistake again, though).

In addition, Jacky Rosen unseated Dean Heller in Nevada (I also think she should send a thank-you card to Rick Perry over his remarks about Yucca Mountain). And how cool is it that the the thoroughly wretched Kris Kobach lost in Kansas to a Dem woman? Laura Kelly will be the next governor of that state! And Hosni Mobarak Walker of WI and Rick Snyder of MI are BOTH GONE with Dems now in charge – as someone noted, the three states that decided it for Trump all now have Dem governors!

Update 11/8/18: I forgot that the equally awful Repug Gov. Bruce Rauner of Illinois is done also.

And the best news of all? The U.S. House is ours (including the power to subpoena a certain Delusional, Tiny-Handed Orange Dictator Wannabe and his henchmen – hench-people?).

Now for the bad news…

I thought Scott Wallace ended up doing not too bad of a job rebutting Bri-Fi’s garbage (and boy, was there a slew of it from this supposedly upstanding, Bucks County mama’s boy who acted like he was above the political fray!), but I’m tired of Dems running candidates in congressional elections who seem to beat on a couple of issues (“my opponent isn’t doing this or that!”) without presenting viable policy alternatives. Yes, he went after Bri-Fi over voting for those terrible tax cuts, but he also could have done that on gun reciprocity, gutting consumer financial protections, not doing much of anything while our infrastructure crumbles, internet privacy, renewable energy, etc. (one of these days, a Dem will run against a Repug in this district and actually tailor a campaign to the issues that matter AND MAKE THE CASE THAT THEY WOULD DO A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER JOB!!! I thought Kevin Strouse might do that a few years ago, but he fell short at the end).

Well, I’m sure all of those McMansion owners in Middletown, Wrightstown, Lahaska, Buckingham and elsewhere in PA-01 are happy that Bri-Fi won again. Maybe one of these days, we’ll have congressional representation from someone who apparently doesn’t believe he or she merits the position as a family inheritance. Also, I don’t think anybody except the most rabid Bri-Fi partisans gave a damn about all the “Silver Spoon Scott Wallace” and “Crazy Billionaire” BS, along with Bri-Fi throwing all kinds of unsubstantiated garbage at Wallace over and over again as alluded to previously, even when it was disproven, including the Mumia Abu-Jamal stuff.

Also, when he started his campaign, Wallace had that supposedly cutesy ad with Diane Marseglia about being recruited to oppose Bri-Fi (“You should run!” “No, YOU should run!”). What the hell was that all about? Was that supposed to motivate the base? Also, Philadelphia’s conservative newspaper of record was apparently able to extract a quote from Wallace last week along the lines of “Well, if we lose, it will be my fault.” Wow, THAT sure was a further impetus to knock on doors and try to persuade people (which I did along with many other happy souls last weekend)! Also, on Wallace’s web site, he had that picture of him standing on the porch talking to Marseglia forever with his back to the camera – um, you have to find a way to grab voters with short attention spans, primarily independents…who gave you the bright idea to feature THAT??!!

Wallace stuck me as a decent man, but overall, a low-energy guy who acted like he was late to the party. Even so, I’m not sure if would have mattered, though the demographics are moving in the right direction for us. Also, as Kyle Bagenstose of the Courier Times pointed out, the new PA-01 district was redrawn to include Montco, which definitely helped the Dems and will continue to do so.

On the national stage, yeah, it sucks that Beto lost in Texas (I don’t want to imagine how messed up of a life form you have to be to support somebody like Ted Cruz instead), but again, the margin of victory in this one was a lot closer than anyone expected. Personally, I’d like to see Beto run for something like Mayor of Austin or San Antonio or someplace where he could get more real-world experience in governance and bring that to the table when he runs again (which he should). I always though Patrick Murphy should have done something like that after he lost as U.S. House Rep in 2010 (running Bristol Borough or something) so he could add more diverse experience in governance. At the time, the Courier Times (I’m pretty sure) said he should run for Bucks County Commissioner, which to me is a sucker bet since I can’t remember a time when the Repugs have NOT been in charge. I thought there was a bit of a good idea there, however.

Also, it should be noted that Amy McGrath in KY and Richard Ojeda in WV both lost their U.S. congressional elections (remember that the next time you hear Repugs crowing about how they supposedly “support the troops”). And the last I checked, Kyrsten Sinema might lose by a tiny margin to the utterly wretched Martha McSally in AZ mainly because of a third-party candidate (NEVER support them, people!). I also wasn’t watching Missouri closely enough to find out how Claire McCaskill could actually lose to a particularly scummy liar like Josh Hawley (I guess the fact that he looked good enough on TV was all it took for the “children of the corn”…and speaking of that, Steven Arnold King won in Iowa again for the U.S. House, but once again, the margin of victory was smaller than last time), and I heard that Joe Donnelly ran as a Republican-lite in Indiana and got trounced (David Sirota said that Donnelly should have run like Sherrod Brown – to the extent that Donnelly could have been more populist, I could see that, but as great as Brown is, he actually has been helped by Trump’s steel tariffs, believe it or not, so that definitely isn’t an “apples to apples” comparison).

And oh yeah, we’d been getting warned from Heidi Heitkamp for days about what would happen with her, so even though it’s upsetting, it wasn’t surprising. The Repugs targeted her in particular I think because Trump apparently offered her a job to give up her seat and she refused, to her credit (just like she opposed “Schlitz” Kavanaugh), so of course she had to be destroyed electorally. And that garbage with the Native Americans and the PO boxes (as noted here, sanctioned by a judge nominated by Dubya) apparently put re-election out of reach (again, though, how much of a mental defective do you have to be to actually support someone like Kevin Cramer?).

This to me is cold comfort, but comfort all the same: eleven million more people voted for Senate Democrats than Republicans (here, and I believe I read somewhere that 3 million more voted for Dems in the House). This election, though, Democrats were hobbled by having to play defense in so many states (that’s why, though I was hoping and praying for the House, I never really considered seriously that they’d win the Senate – sorry). However, if we have the same level of participation (or better) in 2020 with Repugs having to defend their Senate seats more than Dems (including Sen. Mr. Elaine Chao), I honestly believe that it will be an altogether different result (and if there was any Russian hacking going on, it certainly didn’t play a role in the U.S. House races).

And another thought – I’ve often wondered why we don’t have something along the lines of an ALEC for our side. I’m basically talking about a progressive/liberal group formulating policy for all 50 states and territories based on data from polling likely voters, so our candidates KNOW what issues they have to hit on before they utter their first words. I always though the Obama campaign, for example, did a good job with that, and I don’t know why we can never seem to leverage that nationwide.

I also wonder if it wouldn’t be a bad idea to start a drive to boycott states where people vote for Republicans, particularly Florida. I’m sorry, but I have to say it – the win (Update 1 11/9/18: So far, though a recount is in progress…) for Ron (“Birth of a Nation”) DeSantis over Andrew Gillum can be straight-up attributed to racism. DeSantis might as well wear a white hood and robe the day he’s sworn in.

Update 2 11/9/18: Also, “Iron ‘Stache” Randy Bryce lost his valiant fight for Paul Ryan’s old district (WI-1), and Ammar Campa-Najjar is currently contesting what is (so far, again) his loss to the execrable Duncan Hunter in CA-50.

I’ll leave you with this, which I’ve mentioned before – in 1964, the Republican Party and movement conservatism was flat on its metaphorical back, having been clobbered by Lyndon Johnson and the Dems vs. Barry Goldwater. And it took them 16 years to ascend to power, but they formulated a strategy, kept at it, and pulled it off (to our great ruin as far as I’m concerned). To me, there’s no reason why we can’t replicate that.

We have the numbers on our side. And the issues. And (I believe) the people to make it happen.

Let’s take some time to decompress, but then when the time comes, let’s get back it again.

We’re going to turn this around. And when we do, it will be for good.

Update 11/10/18: First the bad news – apparently, I congratulated Tina Davis a little too early, since ballots are still being counted and, as of now, Repug Tommy Tomlinson is leading. Now the good news – from what I read, Dem Kyrsten Sinema is leading in Arizona!

Update 11/11/18: And I thought this was a great story too – the lesson is to compete everywhere!

Update 11/14/18: Sinema eventually won, with Martha McSally offering gracious words of encouragement in her concession, and Davis lost to Tommy Tomlinson by 100 votes, but she’ll keep her position in the state legislature. Under PA law, she was also able to run for her house seat at the same time as the senate seat, and she won her house seat handily.

Update 11/17/18: I was wrong about Davis/Tomlinson – Davis has gone to court to get what apparently are about 200 absentee ballots counted, so this isn’t over yet.

Update 12/12/18: A judge ruled against Davis in her petition related to the absentee ballots, so Tomlinson keeps his job in the PA Senate and Davis keeps hers in the PA state house.

Update 12/27/18: Gee, no wonder McSally was so happy when she lost – maybe it’s because she knew she would eventually end up in the Senate anyway? (here).

Candidates of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party, 2018 (Updates)

For Bucks County, PA local folk (and statewide also)…

This is Ryan Gallagher, running for state representative for PA-31. He is the candidate of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party.

To support Democrat Perry Warren, Gallagher’s incumbent opponent, click here.

This is Marguerite Quinn. She is a member of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party running for PA State Senator in District 10.

To support Steve Santarsiero, Quinn’s opponent, click here.

Update 10/26/18: More from Steve appears below..

This is Brian Fitzpatrick, the U.S. House Representative for PA-01. He is a member of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party running as the incumbent in the PA-01 U.S. House contest.

To support Democrat Scott Wallace, Fitzpatrick’s opponent, click here.

This is Lou Barletta (on the right of course). He most definitely is a member of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party running for U.S. Senate from PA.

To support our Dem incumbent Senator Bob Casey, Barletta’s opponent, click here.

And finally…

This is Scott Wagner (again on the right of course). Maybe more than anyone else on this list, he is a member of the Trump/Kavanaugh Party running for PA Governor.

To support our Dem incumbent governor Tom Wolf, Wagner’s opponent, click here.

Update 10/12/18: While our Republican lunatic in PA said this, Governor Wolf did something constructive and commendable (here).

Update 10/15/18: To paraphrase that great quote from Groucho Marx, I’d call Wagner a baboon, but that’s insulting to the other baboons (here).

A Bri-Fi “Sign O’The Times” (UPDATES)

I just noticed this big, obnoxious board by the side of the road next to the Lower Makefield Dog Park (in Bucks County, PA, for the unfamiliar) for Brian Fitzpatrick, running against Scott Wallace for the PA-01 U.S. House seat.

I guess the thinking is that animal lovers would be passing by the area. Of course, if someone was really trying to make a strategic decision of some kind, they would know that the dog park is practically a ghost town anyway, and my guess is that it’s because people couldn’t be bothered with paying the membership fee which I believe is $50 a month (I don’t own a dog, so I don’t know for sure).

And I thought that seeing this sign gave me an opportunity to make a bit of a case for free speech.

It’s really important for us to communicate our political opinion using our First Amendment rights, and I think this is an example. I mean, it would be truly unfortunate if, say, this board were to be splattered with paint, mud, or some other substance that would make it completely illegible.

Likewise, it would be impolite at a minimum if someone were to – oh, I don’t know – accidentally drag a trailer hitch over the sign, uproot it and carry it into the nearby woods. I shudder to think at the impertinence behind such a course of behavior.

And that’s to say nothing of a stray lit match that could engulf it in flames, turning it into cinders to be swept away with the pickup of next week’s trash. I cannot emphasize how (at the very least) disconcerting that would be as well!

There, I said it, and I hope you now feel a bit enlightened also. Thanks for your time.

Update 1 10/12/18: So the endorsement is a fraud – typical for Bri-Fi!

Update 2 10/12/18: It looks like Bri-Fi won the endorsement of the Michael Bloomberg-backed group Everytown for Gun Safety, as noted here.

However…

The Bucks County iteration of Everytown’s grassroots arm, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, disbanded this week to protest the endorsement, said former coleader Jessica Getz.

Getz said Fitzpatrick didn’t show up at the local March for Our Lives or other gun-control events, while his Democratic opponent, Scott Wallace, did attend.

She also disliked that Fitzpatrick said in a letter that he voted against the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, an NRA-backed bill that would make states honor concealed-carry permits from other states, because of “extraneous provisions” in the legislation. He has a “firm belief in the concept of reciprocity,” he wrote.

“The fact that he would have supported that is outrageous,” said Getz.

Fitzpatrick countered that he hasn’t accepted any contributions from pro-gun groups, and he’s right (here).

But if he believes in “reciprocity,” then he’s doing the NRA’s bidding anyway. And as far as I’m concerned, it also proves that Bri-Fi doesn’t give a damn about law enforcement (here).

Update 10/14/18: Uh, yeah – THIS is more like it!

And by the way, I’ve been driving around Wrightstown, Lahaska, Warminster and Newtown in Bucks County, and I’ve counted about 4 of those signs total. They all need to go!

Update 1 10/17/18: Stop the presses! No end to Bri-Fi’s nonsense, apparently (here – and he only fired the guy because he was caught).

Update 2 10/17/18: The “Not True” signs have been removed, but of course that huge, obnoxious (and completely untrue) billboard remains.

Report Card for “Bri-Fi,” 2018

As we know, the mid-term elections are fast approaching, so I thought now was as good a time as any to take a look at what our Wet Noodle 2.0 U.S. House Rep for PA-01 was up to (I’m referring to Brian Fitzpatrick of course).

To begin, it should be noted that Bri-Fi sought to burnish his “pro-life” bona fides by voting for a 20-week abortion ban (that and other votes are noted here – fortunately, as noted here, the ban was rejected by the U.S. Senate in January).

As noted here, though…

Nearly 99 percent of abortions occur before 21 weeks, but when they are needed later in pregnancy, it’s often in very complex circumstances. For example, severe fetal anomalies and serious risks to the woman’s health — the kind of situations where a woman and her doctor need every medical option available.

20-week bans are also highly unpopular throughout the country. 61% of all voters say abortion should be legal after 20 weeks. Plus, Democrats (78%), Republicans (62%), and Independents (71%) say this is the wrong issue for lawmakers to be spending time on.

Fitzpatrick also voted for a permanent ban on federal funds for abortions or health coverage that includes abortions (which is pointless because federal funding for abortions is already banned under the Hyde Amendment, named after a serial philanderer in Congress – more here).

When it comes to civil liberties, Fitzpatrick also voted to reauthorize warrantless spying under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA); Republicans managed to make it worse in the process according to some fourth amendment advocates (a group which should include everyone I realize).

As noted here…

“Not only does the (reauthorized) bill say you have our blessing to collect communications that contain a target’s email address, it also endorses collecting communications that merely contain a reference to the target,” says Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security program at New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice. “So literally if you and I sent an email to each other that had the word ISIS in it, if you and I send an email that talks about ISIS, under this bill the government is authorized to collect it.” (Assuming ISIS is a group that the NSA is specifically targeting.)

The bill does impose a warrant requirement upon the FBI, but the way it’s written appears to weaken privacy protections rather than strengthen them, says Goitein. Under the legislation, FBI agents need a warrant to search the Section 702 database when a criminal investigation has already been opened, but not when national security is involved. That means the FBI can query the database on nothing more than a tip. “It incentivizes doing searches earlier and earlier, when it’s less and less justified,” says Goitein.

Fitzpatrick also voted along with Generalissimo Trump (which he has done about 83 percent of the time according to Nate Silver) in the matter of disciplining VA whistleblowers (here).

Also, as noted here…

The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s report says VA whistleblowers are far more likely than their colleagues to face discipline or removal after reporting misconduct.

…

The number of VA workers fired is up under President Trump. But congressional Democrats and the VA’s union cite VA data showing that the vast majority of those fired in the first five months of 2018 were low-level food service, laundry and custodial staff the majority of whom are veterans. In that same period, only 15 out of 1,096 employees fired were supervisors.

This report comes as the VA’s own inspector general has publicly clashed recently with the VA leadership over access to documents and information about whistleblower adjudication.

A recent NPR investigation showed a pattern of often vicious whistleblower retaliation at the VA in central Alabama and sidelining of whistleblowers in Indiana.

There’s also a news report this week that the VA, under Acting Secretary Peter O’Rourke, is aggressively reassigning or forcing out VA staff members thought to be disloyal to President Trump and his agenda for the agency.

I realize that we’ve had VA issues with both Democratic and Republican presidents (probably the result of too many damn wars and too many of our heroes getting maimed in our country’s service and putting a strain on available resources), but I don’t know of anyone being forced out for being “disloyal” to President Obama.

And speaking of Number 44, Fitzpatrick repeatedly attacked Obama-era rules, including a rule blocking states from defunding Planned Parenthood (here) as well as another rule requiring employers to keep better record of workplace injuries (here). He also voted to overturn a rule prohibiting labor law violators from eligibility for federal contracts, allowing these companies to underpay their workers once more and evade safety regulations (here).

Fitzpatrick also voted to overturn an Obama rule banning drug testing jobless applying for unemployment. As noted here…

As things have long stood, states only had the authority to institute drug tests for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families cash welfare program. Thus far, 13 states have instituted such regimes. But what their experience has proven year after year is that the tests, while costly to administer, turn up very few positive test results. Out of about 250,000 applicants and recipients among these states in 2016, just 369 tested positive; in four states, exactly zero people tested positive for illegal drug use. In the states with positive results, they ranged from a low of 0.07 percent of all applicants to a high of 2.14 percent, rates far below the nearly 10 percent drug use rate among the general population.

…

Meanwhile, states collectively spent $1.6 million on drug testing, on top of the nearly $2 million spent during the previous two years, despite the apparent ineffectiveness of these programs. That’s money that could instead be used to expand welfare benefits or even drug treatment programs.

Another vote from Fitzpatrick to overturn Internet privacy rules allowed internet service providers, or ISPs, to sell “financial and medical information. Social Security numbers, web browsing history, mobile app usage (and) even the content of your emails and online chats,” according to Sam Gustin of the web site Motherboard (vote is here).

Fitzpatrick also voted to end federal checks preventing more than 167,000 veterans deemed “mentally incompetent” from keeping or purchasing firearms (H.R. 1181). This is part and parcel of Bri-Fi’s utterly craven voting recording in near-total fealty to the NRA. As noted here:

In February 2017, Fitzpatrick voted to block the Social Security Administration from sharing information with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System on people with mental disorders in order to prevent them from purchasing firearms.

In November, 2017 Fitzpatrick voted twice to block the establishment of a select committee on gun violence prevention.

In December 2017, Fitzpatrick said he supports concealed carry reciprocity which would force states like Pennsylvania to defer to the concealed carry weapon laws of more pro-gun states like Texas.

In February 2018, Fitzpatrick voted to kill consideration of legislation on gun regulations.

In March 2018, Fitzpatrick voted to block three bills to close gun safety loopholes including the gun show, internet sale, and classified ad background check loopholes to prevent the sale of guns without a completed background check.

Fitzpatrick also voted to prohibit Department of Justice (DOJ) settlements requiring parties to donate monies to outside groups. This may seem a bit obscure, but as a result, the following should be noted from here…

The decision (to distribute settlement funds only to those directly harmed by wrongdoing) by the Justice Department throws into question an upcoming $12 million settlement against Harley-Davidson. As part of the settlement, the motorcycle manufacturer agreed to stop selling illegal after-market devices that increase the air pollution emitted by the motorcycles.

Harley-Davidson had agreed to donate $3 million to a project to reduce air pollution, the Justice Department said in August. With Sessions’s decision Monday, that settlement’s fate is now up in the air.

Also, Fitzpatrick voted to get rid of financial protection regulations, otherwise known as the Dodd-Frank Act, put in place to increase financial stability and consumer protections in the wake of the 2008 recession. As Gregg Gelzinis of the Center for American Progress notes here…

The CHOICE Act also allows banks of any size to opt out of a suite of crucial regulations—such as stress testing, living wills, risk-based capital requirements, liquidity requirements and more—if they maintain a leverage ratio of 10 percent. And it repeals the Volcker Rule’s ban on risky proprietary trading bets. A 10 percent leverage ratio is not nearly enough capital to justify such drastic deregulation.

Furthermore, the CHOICE Act shreds the authority and resources of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the council of financial regulators tasked with looking at risks across the financial system. FSOC would no longer have the power to address dangers that emerge outside of the traditional banking sector, putting taxpayers at risk. The bill also eliminates the Office of Financial Research, which provides data-driven research support to FSOC to help identify emerging risks.

And speaking of money matters, Fitzpatrick also voted for his party’s so-called tax reform bill last December, which adds about $1 trillion to the deficit (which, of course, Republicans only care about when they’re trying to utterly gut the social safety net). The non-partisan Tax Policy Center found that after the tax plan has taken full effect in 2027, 80 percent of the benefits would go to the top 1 percent of earners in this country. When it comes to tax cuts, the top 1 percent will get an average cut of $1,022,120, while the middle 20 percent will get an average cut of $420, eviscerating any notion that the middle class are the key beneficiaries of the Republicans’ “Unified Framework for Fixing Our Broken Tax Code.”

As noted here…

Should Trump-state Senate Democrats who voted against the tax bill, like Claire McCaskill (Missouri), Joe Manchin (West Virginia), Joe Donnelly (Indiana), and Jon Tester (Montana), really fear electoral backlash?

Absolutely not, according to our analysis. In fact, they should highlight their opposition to Trump’s tax bill even in these red states.

Most polling about the bill has been national, and it suggests broad unpopularity. Our analysis of exclusive national data to model state support for the tax bill suggests that Democrats have little to fear from the GOP law and should embrace progressive policies to mobilize opposition.

Update 10/5/18: For the record, here is Fitzpatrick’s vote from December, and here is a recent vote to make the tax cuts for the rich permanent – heckuva job!

And for anyone out there who may have bought into the “trickle down” lie still after all this time, I give you the following (here)…

In the first six months after the Trump tax cuts were passed, corporate investment in equipment declined, America’s projected long-term deficit swelled by nearly $2 trillion, and wages for the vast majority of American workers fell on an inflation-adjusted basis.

And there is no sign that reality will start comporting with the GOP’s predictions any time soon. As the Washington Post’s Heather Long notes, Morgan Stanley reported last month that America’s businesses are planning less future capital spending now than they were a few months ago. And that finding is bolstered by a recent survey of 393 businesses from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the audit firm RSM, which found that only 38 percent of those firms plan to increase investment over the next three years.

Instead of channeling their profits into productive investment, S&P 500 companies are on pace to plow a record-setting $800 billion into buying back their own stocks. The point of such “stock buybacks” is to increase a firm’s share price (and thus, in many cases, the performance-based pay of its CEO) by reducing the supply of shares on the market.

Oh, and for good measure, it should be noted that, according to Nate Silver, Fitzpatrick voted no to impeachment resolutions against Trump at least twice (I realize this isn’t shocking given that they’re in the same party, but it should be pointed out for the record).

By himself, as far as I’m concerned, Brian Fitzpatrick hasn’t done nearly enough to merit another two years in the U.S. Congress. Worse, he’s part of a majority that has done nothing whatsoever to rein in a calamitously unqualified individual currently taking up space in An Oval Office.

Given that, I see absolutely no alternative than to vote for Scott Wallace for Congress from PA-01 on November 6th.

Bri-Fi Dishes Weak Wallace “Sauce” in PA-01

Here is my link to a typically disgusting attack ad by Brian Fitzpatrick against Scott Wallace in the PA-01 U.S. House race:

I apologize for inflicting that on you, but I had to do so to point out the two pernicious pieces of misinformation that must be noted (purposely conflated in the ad in a way that I’ll point out).

First, at 11 seconds, the ad shows pictures of crying kids along with a quote from Wallace that there’s “no such thing as a victim’s conduct being off limits.”

That quote came from a New York Times story about a 1988 trial where Matthew Solomon was accused of murdering his wife Lisa, and the remark about victim’s conduct had to do with Lisa having a temper and allegedly frequenting bars. I realize there’s nothing whatsoever that is illegal about having a temper and going to a bar, but that typically vile ad by Fitzpatrick suggests at about 11 seconds that Wallace was referring to kids, when in fact he was referring to an adult.

Wallace, by the way, said this when he was the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ acting executive director and legislative director…you know, an advocacy group for defendants (as the story tells us).

And do you know what else Wallace said in that same New York Times article from 30 years ago?

As far as the victims’ movement is concerned, Mr. Wallace said, ”We’ve had little skirmishes where the clashes come into the courtroom and actually affect the trial, but so far the movement seems to be confined to showing greater compassion for victims – involving them in the process, giving them notice of when a suspect is caught and providing them with compensation – and we’re all for that.”

Wow, what dastardly pinko propaganda that is (OK, snark mode off…).

And why are kids included here? Well, at 15 seconds, the ad claims that Wallace has “a history opposing laws that protect victims of sexual abuse.”

From this Fix Noise article, we learn the following:

In 1990, (Wallace) slammed a Supreme Court ruling that upheld laws protecting sexually abused children from having to testify face-to-face with the accused in open court and instead be allowed to testify and be cross-examined at another location.

Wallace said the decision could open the doors to false accusations and allowing other emotionally traumatized witnesses not to face the accused. “This decision increases greatly the chances of a false accusation not being discovered and increases the risk of an innocent person being convicted and sent to prison,” said Wallace, according to a 1990 Newsday article, adding that the ruling “may send a signal to experiment with other kinds of witnesses where there is a likelihood of serious emotional trauma.”

Again, Wallace said this nearly 30 years ago in his capacity as acting executive and legislative director for a defendants’ advocacy group.

But of course, this is “proof” that Scott Wallace hates kids, isn’t it?

From the same Fox article, we learn the following:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t deny the funding for the legal advocacy group or address whether Wallace still shares the views he expressed in the past. But she stressed that he is supported by law enforcement.

“Scott Wallace worked with Republicans and Democrats on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, writing tough new crime laws, including the Missing Children’s Act and laws to help runaway and homeless youth. Wallace is endorsed by law enforcement because he has the experience to fight in Congress to keep our communities safe,” she wrote to Fox News in an email.

Yeah, this is more chicken nonsense from our Wet Noodle 2.0 Repug U.S. House rep, who has proven that he’s even more lowdown than his brother.

I guess this is what happens when you’re a member of the Trump Party who has voted in favor of “Dear Leader” 83 percent of the time, as noted here.

Update 10/18/18: Sure enough, we received another disgusting mailer from Bri-Fi resurrecting, if you will, the charges refuted in this post (another zombie lie).

Waiting a month or so to repeat the lie about Scott Wallace and kids doesn’t magically change that lie into the truth, Bri-Fi. It’s still a lie!

And apparently, you don’t know the difference.