To begin, Fix Noise blamed Obama here for the stock ticker going down here the day after the election; actually, the Dow started off well on news of the Obama win, but declined because of typically bad Eurozone stuff and the fear of the U.S. House Repugs playing more infantile games with the debt ceiling.
And really, Foxies, do you honestly want to compare the market under Number 44 versus its performance under Former President Highest Disapproval Rating In Gallup Poll History (here)?
Besides, does Williams think we’ll forget that the two trail-blazing Catholic politicians in this country on the national level (former New York Governor Al Smith, as noted here, and JFK, as noted here), were both Democrats?
KENT, Ohio—Tea-party Republicans gathered to watch election returns here on Tuesday cringed when televisions flashed that the Republican Senate candidate had fallen to the incumbent Democrat.
Sen. Sherrod Brown beat back a challenge by state treasurer Josh Mandel, a candidate with near-celebrity status among tea partiers here.
The outcome “feels like people who work hard are really outnumbered here,” said JoAnn Schlue, a Republican voter who lives south of Kent, in northeast Ohio. A batch of early results showed Democrats retained control of the Senate.
Shortly after, an “Oh, no,” and groans went through the room as Fox News called Ohio for President Barack Obama. “Why? Why?” several women at a table strewn with confetti moaned.
For the tea party, Tuesday’s results tested the potency of a movement that helped reshape Washington two years ago. The party’s surge helped Republicans retake the House in 2010 and jump-started an anti-spending movement in Washington.
According to exit polls Tuesday, 21% of respondents said they supported the tea-party movement, with 30% opposing it and 41% remaining neutral.
So basically (now, as in 2010), we’re talking about a small, noisy minority. Which we already knew was the case.
“I will reconsider where we’re going and what we’re doing,” said Tom Zawistowski, executive director of the Portage County Tea Party and president of the Ohio Liberty Coalition, the umbrella for Ohio tea-party groups. “We thought when we won in 2010 that the people were speaking, but this tells us differently.”
Gee, ya’ think?
As Mr. Zawistowski spoke, the room drained of volunteers. In five minutes, it was empty, except for two women collecting black, white and blue centerpieces from the tables.
“Is there a country I can move to?” asked Paul Freck of Twinsburg, cringing at returns from nationwide Senate races.
Yeah, wingnut; go ahead and move to Iran. Or Yemen. Or Somalia. You know, a place with the type of “government” you would appreciate.
Oh, and by the way, Teahadists, thanks for giving us the U.S. Senate, as noted here.
The Republican Party spent at least $1 billion on the 2012 presidential campaign and it still lost by a clear two percentage points in the national popular vote. There was no serious effort to reach out to women or Hispanics, nor to young Americans – a constituency who responded tremendously to Ronald Reagan back in 1980.
Ronald Reagan have never have blamed (sic) these groups for not voting Republican. He would certainly never have written off 47 percent of Americans as a waste of time. He would never have dreamed of even thinking such a thought. Ronald Reagan loved and respected ordinary working Americans and they knew it. He always recognized clearly that arrogant, self-appointed elitists were political poison to the conservative movement and the GOP.
Too funny – as noted from here (regarding Ronnie supposedly being a friend of the working man)…
“If you’ll remember, there were 2 million who lost their jobs in the last six months of 1980, during the election…” (1/8/82)
As I pointed out in the prior post (based on “Ronald Reagan’s Reign of Error,” by Mark Green and Gail MacColl) the number of people employed increased in the last six months of 1980, ending the year with 283,000 more people working than in July.
“I realize there’s been an increase in unemployment. It’s been a continuation of an increase that got underway in the last several months of 1980.” (1/19/82)
Still wrong. In the last six months of 1980, unemployment declined from 7.8% to 7.3%. It declined further to 7.2% in 1981, before beginning to climb to double-digit figures.
“We have…in some of the hardest-hit states, extended the unemployment insurance. There’s nothing that strikes to my heart more than the unemployed…”(3/31/82)
Then how come the Labor Department estimated that changes in the eligibility formula for the 1981 budget reduced extended benefits for 1.5 million jobless workers? Moreover, changes in the way a state became eligible for the extended benefit program had Michigan – the hardest hit of the states, then pretty much as now – thrown off that program for 13 weeks just prior to the President’s heartfelt speech.
“Is it news that some fellow out in South Succotash somewhere has just been laid off?” (3/16/82)
And this is shades of Glenn Beck…
“Anyone who wants to take a look at the writings of the members of the brain trust of the New Deal will find that President Roosevelt’s advisers admired the Fascist system.” (New York Times, 8/17/80)
Some of the New Dealers made references to the efficiency of the Italian government. So did Winston Churchill. This does not add up to an admiration of fascism. Neither FDR nor the New Deal brain trust ever hinted at adopting that political program.
…and from “Tear Down This Myth” by Will Bunch…
…Jim Cramer, the popular, wild-eyed TV stock guru, and hardly a flaming liberal – was giving a speech at Bucknell University in which he traced the roots of the current mortgage crisis all the way back to the pro-business policies initiated nearly three decades earlier by America’s still popular – even beloved by some – fortieth president, the late Ronald Wilson Reagan. “Ever since the Reagan era,” Cramer told the students, “our nation has been regressing and repealing years and years’ worth of safety net and equal economic justice in the name of discrediting and dismantling the federal government’s missions to help solve our nation’s collective domestic woes.”
But more to the point, I have some questions for conservatives; namely, don’t you realize that you can’t ultimately win with the tactics you’ve used since Reagan (at least that far back, and probably longer)? Don’t you see that your core demographic (elderly conservative white people) is slowly dying out, making you pretty much a minority-only party? Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, the majority of this country is pretty much tired of your act?
Don’t you realize that you have to change?
Well, I got my answers to those questions today when I came across the following from clownhall.com:
And I just have one thing to say about this story (more “Mikey The Beloved” myth-making in Tuesday’s wake, on the only race we lost); any “Democrat” who actually voted for Fitzpatrick instead of Kathy Boockvar should, if they had a spec of integrity, get the hell out of our party and not let the door hit them as they leave.